![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Backgrounder: FREE Mindanao was invited to join the consultation meeting with MinJourn (Merpu Roa, et al) on November 11-12, 2000 in Opol, Misamis Oriental. Although both groups are involved in pushing forth the issues and concerns affecting media practitioners based in Mindanao, they work around different objectives and implementing strategies giving them their unique identities. Geographically, for example, FREE Mindanao operates in the Cotabato-General Santos-Saranggani area while MinJourn covers the Western Mindanao including Davao provinces. Some FREE members also come from Davao, Pagadian and Ozamiz; in fact, a journalist may be FREE member already as he signs up with Minjourn.
1. “Public Journalism Organizational Workshop.” After the consultation meeting, a ‘networking/research’ activity was conducted on December 7-9, 2000 in Cotabato City (Estosan Hotel) to meet with the officers and some members as well as identify future interventions with the FREE organization. 2. Public Journalism was formally introduced in a seminar at Lake Sebu,
South Cotobato to FREE Members, other media practitioners as well as campus
writers from different points in Mindanao. The seminar-workshop entitled “Developing
Public Journalism Projects” was conducted on Feb. 23-25 2001. PJ
Action Plans to ensure sound governance in the 2001 elections were also
drafted during the Lake Sebu seminar. 3. Romy Elusfa, sec-gen, and Ruby “Tibor” Padilla-Sison, from FREE
Kidapawan were invited to the Partners Interfacing Session in Manila (Cravings
Restaurant, Q.C.) to discuss possible PJ initiatives during the
campaign-elections period. 4. Convening the Peoples’ Forum for Sound Governance (PFSG) for the 2001 elections was media initiated and was one of the PJ initiatives planned by FREE. The conveners s were from the academe (Notre Dame Univ.), the church-based groups, Barangay representatives, student groups (Supreme Student Government of NDU), NGOs, civic organizations, among others. The PFSG’s precursor was the Multi-Sectoral Agenda for Sound Governance
and Sustainable Peace & Development in Cotabato City formed prior to the
1998 elections as initiated by Edgar Ramirez of the Center for Policy
Advocacy and Strategic Studies on Notre Dame University (NDU-CPASS). Several
issues and concerns were raised and included in this agenda for the
candidates to include in their platforms of government. It was revived and
formally organized (given a name) now called the People’s Forum for Sound
Governance (PFSG). This was validated by Kirbee _______, President of the
Supreme Student Government of NDU. 5. In April, a people’s consultation was conducted by the PFSG with FREE as lead convener. Several representatives from different non-government organizations and the academe drew up the People’s Agenda and this was planned to be presented to the Candidates in a Forum shortly before the elections in May. Participants were representatives from media outfits, NGOs, civic/business groups, barangay officials, church-based groups, peace advocates, youth, professionals, and others. The final agenda would be crafted after the representatives go back and consultation with their respective groups. The group also agreed on other related activities such as the Candidates’ Forum & Covenant Signing, Fly a Kite & Light a Candle for peaceful & honest elections, Winners’ Forum, and periodic Ulat sa Bayan. In all these activities, other media outfits will provide coverage. 6. Candidates’ Forum & Covenant Signing last May 7 2001 was held at the NDU open court. It was facilitated by various members of the PFSG. It was well attended and covered by media. The Peoples’ Agenda was presented to the candidates then the candidates gave their response by party affiliation. Signing took place. 7. Seminar on Strengthening Media Alliances for Better Communities
8. Third Assembly of the Federation of Reporters for New members were sworn in, election of officers was conducted. A report by the FREE Chairman was delivered, it covered accomplishments from the second assembly to date. Some of its accomplishments may be considered Public Journalism-related activities since the media involved engaged community members on issues of their concern and together implemented actions for their voices to be heard, these were as follows:
Information gathered during interviews:
Roles of the sectoral partners:
Who initiated the pre-election activities (PJ initiator)?
PJ strategies:
Media Actions:
Status of election issue: on-going. The next step is the “ulat.” When asked as to the possible positive results of the consultation and candidates forum, he mentioned 3 outcomes:
Some Helpful Factors:
Some Not helpful Factors:
Insights of Kirbee:
NOTE: when asked if the concept of PJ was explained to the PFSG, Kirbee said that they were not told about the concept nor were they told that this election activity was a PJ activity. Does not know possible effects if they were told. |
|||||